Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
(Un)reasonable endeavours: force majeure clauses and offers of non-contractual performance
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Can a party be required to accept an offer of non-contractual performance so as to overcome what would otherwise be a force majeure event? In its recent decision in MUR Shipping BV v RTI Limited, the Supreme Court held that the answer to this question was “no”, finding that the Appellant was not obliged to accept an offer by the Respondent to pay in euros where the contract provided for payment in USD. While the court’s decision may provide parties with greater certainty when it comes to force majeure clauses, this certainty arguably comes at the expense of a “business common sense” approach, and leaves open the possibility that a contract may be suspended or terminated even where a force majeure event could have been overcome by acting reasonably.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
