Feature

Secured claims in French restructurings: lessons from the 2021 reforms and recent large case precedents

In this article, Jean-François Adelle considers the treatment of secured creditors in in-court restructurings following the 2021 reforms.

Blended finance: funding sustainable development with public and private funding

The concept of blended finance is not new. But it is being applied beyond its traditional development and impact finance roots as a way to mobilise scaled private capital flows for the purposes of achieving sustainable development goals. In this article, we look at the different definitions of “blended finance” and how blended finance can be used to combine public and private capital for climate, nature and broad sustainable development purposes.

Security financial collateral arrangements and the crystallisation of floating charges

In this article Jonathan Haines considers whether the crystallisation of a floating charge means that it can qualify retrospectively under the Financial Collateral Arrangements (No. 2) Regulations 2003 (2003/3226) and the impact of that on other creditors.

Alternate realities: transactional and economic reality in APP fraud and unjust enrichment

Two recent conflicting judgments have considered whether, for the purposes of a claim in unjust enrichment against a receiving bank, a transfer of funds following an authorised push payment fraud is made “at the expense of the claimant”. In this article we consider the application of the concepts of “transactional reality” and “economic reality” in this inquiry.

Market abuse and restitution orders: challenges for FCA policy

This article addresses the potential for the Financial Conduct Authority’s use of its powers to order restitution for market abuse against a listed or publicly traded company/issuer, to undermine the liability regime for such companies to their investors set out elsewhere in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). It suggests that the proportionate issuer liability regime which was adopted, after extensive consultation, between 2006 and 2010, and is now contained in s 90A and Sch 10A FSMA, is a key aspect of UK public market competitiveness and that restitution should not become a substitute means for investors to recover losses for disclosure breaches from the issuer, absent fraud.

Two continents separated by a common language? Harmonising US and European loans

Loan terms that were once predominantly a feature of US loan agreements have over the last decade been more frequently imported into European loan agreement. It has now become common in the European syndicated term loan B (TLB) marker to include "blended" terms, where English law loan agreements incorporate terms and concepts more typical of US loans. Differences do remain across the two markets, and  we will conduct a comparison exercise at the end of this article to show how key terms vary. 

In addition, the contrasting legal and insolvency backdrop in the US versus European jurisdictions necessarily dictates structural differences in credit support and intercreditor frameworks. Drafting complexities can therefore arise if, for commercial reasons, a deal is documented using US terms for a European group, or vice versa, using European terms for a US-dominant group. Here, parties need to be alive to protections you may need to transplant from one set of market norms to another. 

Sanctions defences after Celestial Aviation: when does s 44 of SAMLA 2018 help?

In this article Tom Leary considers the scope of sanctions-based defences under s 44 of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 for banks and financial institutions faced with debt claims, following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Celestial Aviation Services Limited v Unicredit Bank GmbH, London Branch  [2024] EWCA Civ 628.

A new class of debt instruments: carbon credit linked bonds

The genesis and development by IBRD and its structuring banks of bonds with coupons linked to the issuance of carbon credits has been an exciting development in the capital markets and in the natural capital space, though the asset class is not without its challenges. This article explains how this new type of bond works and considers how the asset class can be further developed into a widely used instrument capable of providing large-scale upfront funding to natural capital projects across the globe.

Potential litigation risk in private credit and fund finance: disclosure, consent and valuation

In this article Alex Potts KC identifies the three main areas of litigation, and regulatory enforcement activity, associated with NAV finance in the Cayman Islands.

Sec v Ripple and MiCAR: the classification of cryptoassets as securities

The SEC v Ripple Labs, Inc. case¹ has attracted great interest because of its implications for the qualification of digital assets as securities and, in general, for the future of cryptos in the US, where digital assets are not regulated as such. The EU has adopted a far-reaching regulation of cryptoassets (MiCAR),² which however, does not apply to cryptoassets that fall under the definition of financial instruments, thus leaving the question open as to the applicable regime. To compare potential outcomes had the case been heard in the EU, this article focuses on the issue of whether and under what conditions cryptoassets can be classified as financial instruments under EU law, and the legal implications of such a classification. This article further analyses the interaction between MiCAR and certain existing national regimes that attract to regulation financial products other than financial instruments. Additionally, a summary of the corresponding regulatory landscape in the UK is provided.