Banking regulation in the aftermath of SVB: lessons for regulators and supervisors

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is not evidence of the failure of Basel III since certain capital and liquidity requirements were disapplied in respect of SVB under US law. Regulators should reconsider which banks are “non-systemic” and which deposits are “stable” in the age of social media and mobile banking and supervisory practices should be scrutinised. In the UK, the SVB collapse comes at a time at which the UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is looking at the reform of certain prudential requirements for small banks under its proposals for a “strong and simple framework”. The lessons from SVB may lead to a change in the PRA’s approach. This article focusses on UK banking regulation and supervision and considers potential capital and liquidity reforms in the aftermath of the failure of SVB and its UK arm, SVB UK Limited (SVB UK).