Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Climate-related disasters, why insurance is not the solution and what is
© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All rights reserved.
We are in the Age of Climate Superlatives: all seven continents have experienced rolling record temperatures and floods, unprecedented glacier retreats, massive forest fires and more. The consequences have been expensive in terms of lives, livelihoods, economic losses and disruption. In 2024 alone, tropical cyclones caused over $100bn in financial loss and damage and hundreds of lives in the Caribbean, southern United States, and southwest Asia. Floods in China, Brazil, Spain, Germany and across Africa cost about half of that and also killed hundreds. Multi-year droughts across sub-Saharan Africa and Central America claimed even more lives and lost livelihoods. A knee-jerk response has been that we need more insurance or insurance instruments like “cat-bonds” and regional risk pools for these climate disasters. This response is understandable but mainly wrong, as I explain below. We need alternative approaches and emerging instruments.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
