Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk: how should Islamic financial law apply in multi-jurisdictional litigious disputes?
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Holders of Islamic financial instruments (often creditors) carry well-justified expectations that offerors and issuers (often borrowers) will observe the highest levels of integrity, transparency and proper (non-prevaricatory) conduct. The discussion surrounding the legal ramifications and impact on the Islamic financial services industry of Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd and others [2017] EWHC 2928 (Comm) (17 November 2017) (Dana Gas PJSC) is therefore still incomplete. The High Court’s decision to rule the Purchase Undertaking valid and enforceable, regardless of whether the Mudarabah Agreement governing the Sukuk had been Shariah complaint or not, barely scratched the surface. Indeed, if anything, what has come out of the High court in Dana Gas PJSC is that not much has been said in a manner which would have addressed fundamental questions pertaining to Sukuk in a norm-setting way.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
