Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Drop downs and up-tiers in English law loan documentation
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Over the past few years there has been a focus on whether loan documentation can be used to create additional priority debt, often as a result of transactions that were not anticipated by incumbent lenders. Various labels have been attached to these types of transaction, with the following becoming common currency: “drop down” and “up-tiering” transactions. While they have different component parts, they result in participating creditors gaining a priority position viz-à-viz other creditors in the borrower’s capital structure. A number of articles discussing aspects of these transactions have been circulated by market participants and the LSTA has published a very helpful market advisory on drafting for New York law credit agreements. This article takes a look at these topics in English law documentation.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
