Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

International financing structures: increased focus on withholding tax

18 March 2024 / Author(s): Dominic Stuttaford
Issue: February 2024 / Categories: In Practice
Company: Norton Rose Fulbright

The ability to obtain withholding tax relief on interest payments is crucial in many international financing structures. For borrowers, without treaty relief, the cost of borrowing from a non-domestic lender increases significantly; in the absence of relief, domestic withholding tax is likely to apply, so the borrower must increase the payment due to the lender, under a so-called gross up clause. This is not entirely one-way; a lender based in a jurisdiction without access to a network of favourable tax treaties is likely to find it too difficult to lend money to foreign borrowers at similar returns to those lenders with access to a wide treaty network. These issues arise not only for third party lenders, but also where a group wishes to finance its international operations. In either case, the parties involved will want to prevent any withholding tax leakage.

If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.