Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Is it time to review your “standard” increased costs clauses in facility documentation?
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
With the advent of the final stage of Basel III implementation (often referred to as Basel IV), it is time again for lenders and borrowers to consider the formulation of “boiler plate” increased costs clauses in their existing credit documentation and future transactions. In this In Practice article we highlight some of the potential interactions the latest reforms may have with commonly seen drafting both in the UK and the US and discuss some of the devices which borrowers and sponsors may use to mitigate the likelihood of being on the receiving end of an increased costs claim in the future.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
