Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Oceanfill v Nuffield: a clear outlook for commercial landlords?
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
This article looks at Oceanfill Limited v (1) Nuffield Health Wellbeing Limited and (2) Cannons Group Limited [2022] EWHC 2178 (Ch) (Oceanfill), which was the first case in which the court (in a judgment of Deputy Master Arkush) determined the effect upon third-party guarantors of restructuring plans arising for sanction under Pt 26A of the Companies Act 2006. It considers the similarities in the court’s approach to schemes of arrangement and restructuring plans respectively, as well as the application of standard contractual principles in this area.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
