Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Possessable or non-possessable? OBG v Allan and the future of intangibles
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
The case of OBG v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 in the House of Lords discussed expanding the tort of conversion to things in action but considered it at para 321 to be “too radical” and that there was a clear distinction to be drawn between the “wrongful taking of a document … and the wrong assertion of a right to a chose in action”. In this article the author explores the position of intangibles such as digital assets in relation to being property and thus possessable.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
