Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Risk retention in securitisations: if not the original lender, who else?
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
It is almost 15 years since the EU’s risk retention (skin-in-the-game) rules were developed in response to concerns that interests of investors in securitisations and their originators were insufficiently aligned. In that time, the market has developed a number of solutions to adhere to the rules in situations where there may no longer be a substantial entity that was involved in the creation of the underlying exposures to perform the risk retention function.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
