Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
The cost of further assurance
© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All rights reserved.
When a further assurance clause (FAC) provides that one party to a loan agreement is to take steps “at the cost” of one of the other parties, sundry questions may arise as to when that debt falls due; whether the debt is subordinated to that owed to other lenders; how it is to be quantified; and how it might be recovered. This article considers those issues where a mezzanine lender has assumed an obligation to provide further assistance or assurance at the request of a senior lender, on the basis that the costs are to be borne by the senior lender or the borrower.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
