Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
The implications of the novel “Audit Duty” on professional service firms: Part 1: Rihan v Ernst & Young
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
In Part 1 of this two-part article, barrister and Chartered Banker Jacob J Meagher analyses the legal basis of the novel “Audit Duty” using Rihan v Ernst & Young [2020] EWHC 901 (QB) as a case study. In Part 2 he discusses the uncertainties related to the scope and application of the “Audit Duty”, in particular to professional service firms more widely.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
