Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

The risks of attempting to rectify mistakes in security documents, without seeking a court order

18 March 2024 / Author(s): James Hall , William Golightly
Issue: October 2023 / Categories: Feature

Where mistakes occur in security documents, practitioners usually have to assess whether they should be rectified by the court, or whether rectification by the parties alone is sufficient (eg in a Deed of Rectification (DoR)). This can create particular headaches if the mistake is spotted after registration; and the consequences may also depend on the nature of the mistake. For example, if the DoR arguably creates a new security (such as by correcting a mistake in the definition of the liabilities secured), this may cause problems where the simple correction of addresses or other typographical errors might not. This article considers the law relating to rectification of such documents, and some of the practical implications of dealing with rectification whether through the courts or simply between the parties to the security.

If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.