Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
The rule in Clayton’s Case: its application in non-banking relationships
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
The rule in Clayton’s Case originated in banking relationships and its application is most often seen in that context. Recently there has been a trend to disapply the rule, in cases where multiple claimants seek to trace into a single fund. This article looks at a recent decision of the Court of Appeal which turned on the application of the rule in a non-banking context, and in particular on the timing of the appropriation of payments which is deemed to take place pursuant to the rule.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
