Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Transfers of risk or risky transfers? Transferring hedging positions in respect of non-performing loans

25 March 2024 / Author(s): Michael Brown
Issue: February 2022 / Categories: Feature

There are a number of key decisions to be made when a hedge counterparty wishes to transfer a hedging position in respect of a non-performing loan. These decisions are driven by legal and commercial considerations in the context of the transaction documents. A number of these considerations are set out below, but each transaction is different and additional considerations may arise. Unless otherwise indicated, this article will assume that if the transaction terminated, the borrower would be obligated to make a payment to the hedge counterparty and that the hedging is entered into under the terms of an ISDA master agreement (hereafter, an ISDA). For ease of reference, the existing hedge counterparty is referred to as the hedge counterparty and the proposed transferee as the transferee, whether before or after any transfer.

If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.