Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Wirral v Indivior: a setback for securities law class actions
© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All rights reserved.
The rise of group securities litigation, often backed by third-party funders, has been a dominant theme of recent years. But just because more claims are being issued does not mean they are being won. The Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in Wirral v Indivior and Reckitt Benckiser [2025] EWCA Civ 40 illustrates the particular issues in bringing mass claims under the statutory regime for misleading market statements.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
