In the UK, multiple procedures to achieve a restructuring are available which can be used alone or in combination with each other. Although there is much to be said for this approach in terms of flexibility and adaptability, there is also a risk of creeping inconsistencies in the regime, as different results are arrived at in determining the same issue depending on which procedure is used. In this article, Sarah Paterson explores a few examples and suggests a growing need for it to be addressed by the courts where that is possible, and by the legislature where it is not.