Articles by author
Reliance: a comparison between the common law and s 90A FSMA
This article compares the reliance requirement for the common law claim of misrepresentation with the statutory action of s 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). The authors focus on recent authority regarding reliance upon implied statements at common law and the uncertainties that remain under s 90A FSMA.
1 JUN 2021UK securities fraud litigation gains momentum: Autonomy and G4S
This article examines two recent decisions in securities fraud cases: (i) ACL Netherlands v Lynch [2022] EWHC 1178 (Ch) (Autonomy); and (ii) Allianz Global Investors GmbH v G4S Limited [2022] EWHC 1081. The former considered such important questions as what published information is caught by s 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), how statements in such information are to be construed, what constitutes the requisite guilty knowledge and how reliance is to be proved. In the latter case, the court held that so-called “person discharging managerial responsibility” (PDMR) status in these claims is limited to English law concepts of directorship but emphasised the potential elasticity of de facto directorship in particular.
1 SEP 2022Damages under ss 90 and 90A FSMA
In this article the authors consider the issues with which the courts will need to grapple when they come to decide how damages under ss 90 and 90A are to be calculated.
1 NOV 2023
