Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

628
Go to page of 63 Next Pagination

Secured transactions law reform: lessons from Asia

This article discusses findings from a new book which examines secured transactions law in thirteen Asian countries. Special focus is given to the drivers, substance and process of law reform, and lessons are drawn from the Asian experience that could aid a broader understanding of the principles and policies shaping legal development in this area.

13 June 2024

Liquidity mismatch in UCITS schemes after Woodford

This article examines the problem of “liquidity mismatch” within certain categories of retail funds and assesses whether recent new rules and proposals from UK regulators adequately address that issue.

13 June 2024

Showing no recourse: in defence of supply chain finance post-Greensill

This article emerged in response to the onslaught of publicity generated by the insolvency of Greensill. For many this has been their first true introduction to supply chain finance and the coverage has not been very positive. Every few years the collapse of an industry stalwart or promising up-and-comer is held up as a cautionary tale, emblematic of underlying weaknesses or failings of its sector. However, it would be unfortunate to let Greensill’s legacy be the tarring of supply chain finance in general when it plays such an important role in facilitating global trade.

13 June 2024

Restructuring debt in the COVID-19 pandemic: class composition in creditors’ schemes

In this article the authors consider recent developments in relation to class composition in creditors’ schemes. With reference in particular to Re Codere Finance 2 (UK) Limited [2020] EWHC 2441 (Ch), they consider whether benefits conferred “outside” the scheme in lock-up agreements may fracture a class of creditors, and the consequences for companies seeking to restructure debt. They also consider whether the recent introduction of Pt 26A restructuring plans may change the focus of class composition analysis going forward.

13 June 2024

The road to Banking Union

Bail-in is at the heart of the post-crisis reform in dealing with failing banks. But in the euro area bail-in must pass a public interest test before it can be used, and bail-in has become the exception not the norm. The norm remains “winding up of the entity under normal insolvency proceedings”. The public interest test should be reversed. The use of bail-in to achieve orderly liquidation under a solvent wind-down strategy should serve as the presumptive path for handling banks that are deemed to be “failing or likely to fail”. Together with the backstop from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) for the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), the reversal of the public interest test will open the door to the creation of the Single Deposit Guarantee Scheme (SDGS) and to the completion of Banking Union.

13 June 2024

A new Consumer Duty in financial services: a significant change, or more of the same?

The FCA, after prompting by Parliament, is pressing ahead with its proposals for a new consumer duty of care like approach in financial services, albeit in a way that does not in fact impose a duty of care. Instead, changes to the existing Principles of Business are being suggested, which will sit at the head of a pyramid of measures designed to bring about change. This article considers the likelihood that change will in fact be achieved.

13 June 2024

Intermediated securities in a securities class action context

The majority of investors in the UK hold their interests through an intermediated chain of securities. The relationships between the investors in the chain are governed by the contracts they have entered into, and the system is largely operated on a “no look through” basis, meaning investors only have rights against their own counterparties. The Law Commission has considered whether to reform the law in this area, in order to give greater rights to ultimate investors. This article considers the impact of any such reform in a securities class action context.

13 June 2024

Parent companies’ liability in tort for the acts of their subsidiaries

In this article the authors consider a parent bank’s liability for the torts of its subsidiary in light of the Supreme Court decision in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell [2021] UKSC 3.

13 June 2024

Financial collateral and Brexit: a comparative perspective

The EU directive on financial collateral (EU Directive 2002/47/EC) (Directive), as implemented in the UK remains (with amendments) on the statute book and has not been directly impacted in any meaningful sense by Brexit. However, given the latitude inherent in the Directive, a marginally fractured legislative landscape has resulted across the member states.

13 June 2024

LIBOR transition and managing competition law risk

In this article Professor Suzanne Rab responds to the Financial Market Law Commission’s clarion call to consider key competition issues arising from a move to Risk Free Rates (RFR) or similar. She identifies challenges for the competition law regulation of banking benchmarking practices that need to be addressed.

13 June 2024
Go to page of 63 Next Pagination