Feature
550
Go to page
of
55
The Excluded Asset Gap: why floating charges capture realisations of unsecured assets
Will the proceeds of the sale of an asset, excluded from the scope of a floating charge, be captured by that charge when sold by an insolvency practitioner? In this article the authors consider the default position under general law in relation to this issue and what parties should do to ensure their intentions are appropriately reflected when formulating security packages.
20 March 2024Cryptoassets, consumers and foreign arbitration
This article considers Soleymani v Nifty Gateway LLC [2022] EWHC 773 (Comm) (Soleymani) in which the High Court held it had no jurisdiction and granted a stay under s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) of proceedings brought by an English consumer primarily to enforce his rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015).
20 March 2024Brass in pocket: the developing benchmark for establishing “consumer” status
In this article Nora Beausang considers recent case law relating to the interpretation of “consumer” for the purposes of special jurisdictional rules (Recast Brussels Regulation and its predecessors), considers whether this interpretation has wider application to other regulatory protections applying to consumers and argues for the limitation of this more expansive interpretation.
20 March 2024Anything but equity! Structuring considerations for a debt for equity swap
There are several regulatory and practical reasons why some creditors may not be able or willing to take up an allocation of equity post-restructuring. In this article the authors explore some of those reasons and provide some potential structuring solutions.
20 March 2024Russian sovereign debt default: a disputes perspective
Russia’s default on its foreign currency sovereign bonds is unprecedented and likely to lead to bondholder litigation as well as derivatives disputes. This article highlights the reasons for Russia’s default and explores the scope of potential bondholder litigation, together with some of the obstacles which bondholders may face in bringing claims against Russia. The article then considers the ripple effect on the derivatives market, where it is possible that investors in products linked to Russian debt may seek to recover losses by bringing mis-selling claims.
20 March 2024The classification of interest rate swaps as contingent liability cases
In this article, Katherine Ratcliffe summarises Mr Justice Jacobs’ decision in CJ and LK Perks v NatWest Markets [2022] EWHC 726 (Comm) as to when the limitation period for an interest rate swap began and explains why Mr Justice Jacobs’ conclusions are correct.
20 March 2024Licence to Quill: legal services licences following the recent wave of Russian sanctions
In the wake of Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine, public perception, triggered – and at times encouraged – by the media and MPs, appears to support a blanket ban on representing persons and entities designated (DPs) under the UK’s new sanctions framework, or even non-designated persons allied to Vladimir Putin or his regime. As a result, lawyers have quickly become stuck between, on the one hand, a purported moral obligation and internal-firm practice based on commercial considerations ostensibly consistent with foreign policy and, on the other, their duty to preserve due process. In this article, Alex Haines delineates between what is and is not permitted.
20 March 2024Loan defaults: untimely remedies and potential hangovers in credit agreements
This article examines some of the current issues arising in leverage finance agreements on defaults and the expansion of express remedy terms that can impact on debt transfers.
20 March 2024Take-off for digital bonds? The EU DLT pilot regime
The EU Regulation on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology entered into force in June 2022. This article examines its key features and likely impact on the market for digital bonds.
20 March 2024Orthodoxy prevails? How receiving banks avoid liability for their customers’ frauds
Two recent cases have considered the issue of when a bank can be held liable by a victim of fraud on the basis that the fraudster directed the victim to make payment to an account held with the defendant bank. In both these recent cases, the receiving bank has been comprehensively excused of any liability. However, whether the receiving bank can ever be held liable in such circumstances remains an open question.
20 March 2024
Go to page
of
55
