Feature
550
Go to page
of
55
Regulatory mandates and review in the 2022 Financial Services and Markets Bill: marking their own homework
There are a number of notable features of the Bill: this article will concentrate on Chapter 3, which concerns the accountability of regulators. The key provisions for the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) are in ss 27-29. These amend the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: (i) s 27 imposes a duty on both the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to review rules; (ii) s 28 gives the Treasury certain powers in relation to rule making; and (iii) s 29 grants the Treasury powers to determine matters which the regulators must include in their considerations when making rules. Together, they represent a significant change to the prudential regulatory process in the UK. In this article, the author explains the background to these provisions, discusses the current text, considers its likely effect, and explores some potential improvements to it.
19 March 2024Commercial choices: are Braganza duties a path to payment under commission agreements?
This article explores whether those engaged to raise finance can use Braganza duties to obtain remuneration, even where finance raising transactions do not occur. In light of the decision in Horlick v Cavaco [2022] EWHC 2935 (KB), there are significant obstacles to such claims.
19 March 2024What is an insolvency proceeding?
To the question in the title, one may be forgiven the innocent response “Who cares?”. In fact, the question matters for all the reasons that legal categorisation matters, and it matters particularly clearly in the context of insolvency. In this article I explain the importance of the question. (This article is adapted from a longer piece which draws on functional, historical, comparative and doctrinal analyses.1)
19 March 2024COMIng apart? Centre of Main Interests under Chapter 15 and the EUIR
In this article the authors consider two recent decisions that illustrate how a US bankruptcy court and the English Court of Appeal (applying the EUIR to a pre-Brexit case) can analyse COMI in different ways. The decisions have implications for groups that need to restructure cross-border financing arrangements – particularly where financing has been raised by a “letterbox” company (SPV). Such companies may face greater challenges establishing that their COMI is in their jurisdiction of incorporation before a US bankruptcy court than they would in Europe.
19 March 2024Re-fencing: the pitfalls, and opportunities, of M&A for ring-fenced banks
The UK’s bank ring-fencing regime puts barriers in the way of mergers and acquisitions by ring-fenced bodies. The government has recently evidenced its intention to relax these, both as part of its review of the regime generally and, during times of crisis, for specific acquisitions. This article outlines the concessions already provided for in the ring-fencing regime and highlights the remaining challenges, particularly for acquirers which are already subject to the ring-fencing regime. (This article does not seek to examine the policy arguments for and against the ring-fencing regime, which have been examined as part of the Ring-fencing and Proprietary Trading Panel Report (referred to as the Skeoch Report) and which are subject to further consideration under a government consultation which is open for response at the time of writing.)
19 March 2024Understanding export controls in UK sanctions legislation relating to Russia: issues for lenders
As exports from the UK to, or for use in, Russia since Spring 2022, have been the subject of rapidly changing restrictions, it has been tricky to keep track of how to navigate and interpret the legislation. In this article Jacqueline Cook, Of Counsel and Senior Knowledge Development Lawyer at Sullivan & Worcester UK LLP, looks at where the UK rules relating to Russia sit and explores how the legislation borrows concepts from commercial law to identify the assets.
19 March 2024“Now what news on the Rialto?”: the resurgence of capacity risk and the slow demise of contractual estoppel
In this article Professor Gerard McMeel KC considers discussions in recent Italian local authority swaps cases of the controversial doctrine of contractual estoppel and its potential impact on questions of capacity.
19 March 2024Digital assets use cases in financial securities: are they “native”?
In this article, Ashurst calls for legislative intervention to facilitate a scaled solution enabling the issuance of “native” Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT)-underpinned financial securities under English law. They draw on the position in French law as an example of how conventional legal frameworks can evolve to accommodate the nuances of digital assets and DLT.
19 March 2024Cross-border enforcement of judgments in the post-Brexit age: a glimmer of light on the horizon?
This article considers whether Hague 2019 represents an attractive additional international convention for UK commercial litigants in cross-border disputes. It assesses the benefits and potential downsides – and the extent to which the convention will reverse the effects of Brexit in the civil justice sphere.
19 March 2024No point preventing fraud? Philipp v Barclays Bank
On Wednesday 12 July 2023, the Supreme Court handed down its unanimous judgment in Fiona Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc [2023] UKSC 25. The Supreme Court’s decision to reverse the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Philipp v Barclays Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 318 will cause consternation and concern to consumers, will be welcomed by banks in the short term, but leaves fraudsters as the big winners. This article analyses the judgment and provides commentary on its implications.
19 March 2024
Go to page
of
55
