The SEC v Ripple Labs, Inc. case1 has attracted great interest because of its implications for the qualification of digital assets as securities and, in general, for the future of cryptos in the US, where digital assets are not regulated as such. The EU has adopted a far-reaching regulation of cryptoassets (MiCAR),2 which however, does not apply to cryptoassets that fall under the definition of financial instruments, thus leaving the question open as to the applicable regime. To compare potential outcomes had the case been heard in the EU, this article focuses on the issue of whether and under what conditions cryptoassets can be classified as financial instruments under EU law, and the legal implications of such a classification. This article further analyses the interaction between MiCAR and certain existing national regimes that attract to regulation financial products other than financial instruments. Additionally, a summary of the corresponding regulatory landscape in the UK is provided.
27 October 2024The parties to a finance transaction are understandably focussed on the commercial deal but the words used in the relevant contracts for the transaction really do matter. The choice, order or absence of words can in some circumstances have a direct monetary impact on the contracting parties’ positions. In this article, the authors consider principles of contractual construction, with recent illustrations from the world of finance and suggestions as to steps parties can take to avoid ambiguity and uncertainty.
27 October 2024In this article Alex Potts KC identifies the three main areas of litigation, and regulatory enforcement activity, associated with NAV finance in the Cayman Islands.
27 October 2024The genesis and development by IBRD and its structuring banks of bonds with coupons linked to the issuance of carbon credits has been an exciting development in the capital markets and in the natural capital space, though the asset class is not without its challenges. This article explains how this new type of bond works and considers how the asset class can be further developed into a widely used instrument capable of providing large-scale upfront funding to natural capital projects across the globe.
27 October 2024This article explores some of the complexities and key considerations for lenders and legal practitioners when taking security over receivables in Germany. We consider: (i) the types of security that can be taken over receivables and their key features/formalities; (ii) how to navigate contractual restrictions on transfer; (iii) potential pitfalls when taking security over receivables; and (iv) secured creditors’ priority when realising security over receivables in an insolvency.
30 September 2024The decision of the Court of Appeal in KVB Consultants Ltd & Ors v Jacob Hopkins McKenzie Ltd & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 765 has important implications for anyone who deals with, appoints or acts as an appointed representative (AR). It applied a number of principles from existing case law but reached a surprising conclusion regarding how a principal can limit the responsibility it takes for its AR.
30 September 2024The radical restructuring of the UK listing framework by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has shifted greater risk to investors. This article examines the potential impact of the overhaul of the regime on future claims brought by shareholders under ss 90 and 90A of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
30 September 2024In this article the authors describe the key features and unique structural considerations and challenges of European Energy’s landmark portfolio construction facility, which was put in place in November 2023 after a two-year bottom-up design, documentation and bank credit approval process.
30 September 2024While country risk cannot be avoided in cross-border transactions entirely, it can be effectively mitigated through careful transaction structuring and tailored contractual protections. Market standard loan agreements will include a number of exit rights and cost recovery provisions which may be helpful to a lender exposed to country risk and can be negotiated to meet the needs of the particular transaction. It is important to strike a balance between the effective management of country risk for lenders, and a contractual framework that provides the borrower with the required economics and flexibility to operate with certainty.
30 September 2024
The FSB consultation report on Liquidity Preparedness for Margin and Collateral Calls (https://www.fsb.org/2024/04/liquidity-preparedness-for-margin-and-collateral-calls-consultation-report/), responded to a number of high-profile loss-making transactions by various banks involved in lending against collateral comprised of large positions in single listed stocks. Recently, the most talked-about debacle was that of Archegos Capital Management (Archegos), the family office of Bill Hwang with total assets reported at around $36bn. In a nutshell, the prices of several stock positions held by Archegos dropped for different reasons and it could not post enough cash collateral, so some of the lending banks had to liquidatethe collateral shares. Some banks managed to exit their positions quickly, but other chose not to, and suffered substantial losses.
This article provides a detailed overview of the issues involved in such large transactions and highlights the key procedural requirements and potential regulatory developments needed.
30 September 2024