Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Market abuse and restitution orders: challenges for FCA policy
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
This article addresses the potential for the Financial Conduct Authority’s use of its powers to order restitution for market abuse against a listed or publicly traded company/issuer, to undermine the liability regime for such companies to their investors set out elsewhere in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). It suggests that the proportionate issuer liability regime which was adopted, after extensive consultation, between 2006 and 2010, and is now contained in s 90A and Sch 10A FSMA, is a key aspect of UK public market competitiveness and that restitution should not become a substitute means for investors to recover losses for disclosure breaches from the issuer, absent fraud.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
