Articles by author
Crypto exchanges: an update on D’Aloia
In this article Nik Yeo discusses how the recent detailed judgment in D’Aloia v Persons Unknown & Bitkup clarifies and extends some previously established contractual and proprietary principles in relation to liability of crypto exchanges to victims of crypto fraud.
22 NOV 2024Battle of the acronyms: GDPR vs AI – automated decision-making by ride-hailing apps
The Amsterdam District Court has recently considered three cases involving ride-hailing apps which throw into focus the nature of automated decision-making processes, particularly those which involve Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (already used by banks across a range of business areas). Although the issues arose in a GDPR context, it is instructive to see how the court addressed them in Applicants v Uber BV (case number C/13/692003/HA RK 20-302), Applicants v Uber BV (case number C/13/687315/HA RK 20-207), and Applicants v Ola Netherlands BV (case number C/13/689705/HA RK 20-258).
1 JUN 2021Tiptoe through the tulips: fiduciary and common law duties of care in cryptocurrency
Tulip Trading Limited v Bitcoin Association for BSV and ors [2022] EWHC 667 (Ch) involved an unusual claim by an alleged owner of Bitcoin seeking to force core developers of the Bitcoin code to take reasonable steps to “patch” that code to circumvent the fact that the claimant no longer controlled the relevant private key. This was analysed by the court on traditional principles of fiduciary duties and common law duties of care, but more broadly the claims can be seen to challenge the decentralized nature of the Bitcoin blockchain and the importance of private keys to the certainty and security of that blockchain.
1 JUL 2022Crypto exchanges: the basics
In this article Nik Yeo clarifies some basic contractual and proprietary principles in relation to the use of crypto exchanges.
1 JUL 2023Byers v Saudi National Bank: bona fide purchase, knowing receipt and crypto litigation
In this article Nik Yeo looks at how the Supreme Court’s decision in Byers has clarified important differences between the bona fide purchase defence to an equitable proprietary claim and the distinct personal claim for knowing receipt, particularly relevant in litigation against recipients of cryptoassets.
1 FEB 2024
